Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84 exptools; site ihdev.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!ihnp4!ihdev!rjv
From: rjv@ihdev.UUCP (ron vaughn)
Newsgroups: net.music
Subject: Re: the big debate
Message-ID: <316@ihdev.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 13-Sep-85 18:42:45 EDT
Article-I.D.: ihdev.316
Posted: Fri Sep 13 18:42:45 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 14-Sep-85 07:31:42 EDT
References: <398@decwrl.UUCP> <5295@mit-eddie.UUCP>
Reply-To: rjv@ihdev.UUCP (55224-R. J. Vaughn)
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
Lines: 23
Summary: 

In article <5295@mit-eddie.UUCP> nessus@mit-eddie.UUCP (Doug Alan) writes:
>> We're not interested in you (and you're not interested in me).  We're
>> interested in what you have to say.
>
>And that's why "Foobar sucks!" is a lousy posting, and "I don't like
>Foobar because ...." followed by thought-out reasons is a reasonable
>posting.
>				-Doug Alan

to read this, you'd think doug was the smartest, most understanding
person in the world.  his letter makes perfect sense. but he doesn't
even come close to following his own advice.  he does "foobar sucks!"
without explination (or "i don't have to give one") often enough.

oh well, i give up.  this has to be the most disapointing group i've
looked into in quite a while.  i never contributed much to this group
because i believe in reading a new group for a while, THEN starting
to throw my $0.02 in.  in this case, however, it doesn't seem to be worth 
the effort...

	later,

	ron vaughn	...!ihnp4!ihdev!rjv