Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site pyuxd.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!pyuxww!pyuxd!rlr
From: rlr@pyuxd.UUCP (Rich Rosen)
Newsgroups: net.music
Subject: Re: the big debate
Message-ID: <1688@pyuxd.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 14-Sep-85 14:04:37 EDT
Article-I.D.: pyuxd.1688
Posted: Sat Sep 14 14:04:37 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 15-Sep-85 00:25:54 EDT
References: <398@decwrl.UUCP> <5295@mit-eddie.UUCP> <316@ihdev.UUCP>
Organization: Whatever we're calling ourselves this week
Lines: 19

>>> We're not interested in you (and you're not interested in me).  We're
>>> interested in what you have to say.

>>And that's why "Foobar sucks!" is a lousy posting, and "I don't like
>>Foobar because ...." followed by thought-out reasons is a reasonable
>>posting.  				-Doug Alan

> to read this, you'd think doug was the smartest, most understanding
> person in the world.  his letter makes perfect sense. but he doesn't
> even come close to following his own advice.  he does "foobar sucks!"
> without explination (or "i don't have to give one") often enough.

That's funny.  I can't recall one time that Doug posted a foobar-sucks-and-
that's-it article.  In fact, if anything, he could only be accused of being
overly long in his "thought-out reasons".  Why the need to tar him like
this?
-- 
"Meanwhile, I was still thinking..."
				Rich Rosen  ihnp4!pyuxd!rlr