Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: $Revision: 1.6.2.16 $; site ada-uts.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!zeta!sabre!petrus!bellcore!decvax!yale!ada-uts!hedger
From: hedger@ada-uts.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.music.synth
Subject: Re: Re: Akai Sampler information
Message-ID: <30100013@ada-uts.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 30-Aug-85 15:08:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: ada-uts.30100013
Posted: Fri Aug 30 15:08:00 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 4-Sep-85 05:26:53 EDT
References: <1227@pucc-k>.UUCP>
Lines: 12
Nf-ID: #R:pucc-k>:-122700:ada-uts:30100013:000:692
Nf-From: ada-uts!hedger    Aug 30 15:08:00 1985


rich,
thank you for clearing up the 'bit' term for me....an for answering the
question about the cost of the disks. I did find your last statement
a bit puzzling however....why is the akai a better investment than
a mirage or an emulator????? a mirage i can understand but surely you
don't think that the akai sounds betteror even as good as an emulator???!!!
(and again for all you performers out there, the fact that the akai saves
1 sample on each side of a diskette seriously limits it's potential as
a live performance instrument...unless you have a roadie to flip diskettes
all night...at least the mirage holds 3 samples on a diskette, and the
emulator can be gotten with dual drives)