Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 Unisoft-Cosmos; site kepler.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!lll-crg!well!micropro!kepler!jpd
From: jpd@kepler.UUCP (John Donovan)
Newsgroups: net.news.group
Subject: Re: Causes on the net... (net.peace)
Message-ID: <214@kepler.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 5-Sep-85 13:34:30 EDT
Article-I.D.: kepler.214
Posted: Thu Sep  5 13:34:30 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 7-Sep-85 07:03:58 EDT
References: <770@vortex.UUCP> <205@kepler.UUCP> <60@l5.uucp> <3462@utah-cs.UUCP>
Organization: MicroPro Int'l Corp., San Rafael, CA
Lines: 19
Summary: Don't bury net.peace

In article <3462@utah-cs.UUCP>, coller@utah-cs.UUCP (Lee D. Coller) writes:
> Why not use mod.politics (the moderator is James Armstrong Jr. (nyssa@abnji)).
> I think that this is the apropriate group for this subject.  So far this group
> has been unused (I have only seen one posting on this machine.).
> 
Let's not bury net.peace in some obscure backwater (sorry, Jim!) where no one 
will be aware of its existence.  If it is to serve some function, then
let's be up front about it.

> I wouldn't read it at all.
> 
You certainly don't have to.  If you don't want to put up with the increased
storage, then you can unsubscribe to it.  No problem.  But let's at least
allow a trial for those who *would* like to see net.peace.

> (If we create net.peace we should create net.war for the rest of us :-)
> 
Uh, OK with me, Lee...But just think how much fun you would miss by not
having net.peace carried live over ARPAnet!