Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site rtech.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!hao!noao!amd!amdcad!amdahl!rtech!jeff
From: jeff@rtech.UUCP (Jeff Lichtman)
Newsgroups: net.news.group
Subject: Re: New group net.vms - VOTE
Message-ID: <632@rtech.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 7-Sep-85 01:22:28 EDT
Article-I.D.: rtech.632
Posted: Sat Sep  7 01:22:28 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 9-Sep-85 04:25:51 EDT
References: <220@stl.UUCP> <336@harvard.ARPA>
Organization: Relational Technology, Alameda CA
Lines: 18

> I don't think that net.vms is really necessary, and would suggest that
> netters vote no. The info-vax mailing list is almost completely about
> VMS and is gatewayed into Usenet in the fa.info-vax group. Since I am
> on the ARPA net I get the postings to info-vax directly, but I
> subscribe to fa.info-vax as well. The longest delay between seeing
> something in my mail and seeing it on info-vax was about three days.
> -- 
> ----------------
>   Marty Sasaki				net:   sasaki@harvard.{arpa,uucp}

This is fine for those on Arpanet, but those of us on uucpnet can't post
to fa.info-vax.  I vote for the creation of net.vms.
-- 
Jeff Lichtman at rtech (Relational Technology, Inc.)
aka Swazoo Koolak

{amdahl, sun}!rtech!jeff
{ucbvax, decvax}!mtxinu!rtech!jeff