Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site mit-eddie.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!gds
From: gds@mit-eddie.UUCP (Greg Skinner)
Newsgroups: net.news,net.notes
Subject: Re: Why digests are bad (whoops)
Message-ID: <5157@mit-eddie.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 30-Aug-85 12:52:35 EDT
Article-I.D.: mit-eddi.5157
Posted: Fri Aug 30 12:52:35 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 1-Sep-85 04:38:12 EDT
References: <10220@ucbvax.ARPA> <5156@mit-eddie.UUCP>
Organization: MIT Lusers and Hosers Inc., Cambridge, Ma.
Lines: 18
Xref: watmath net.news:3867 net.notes:253

I did some playing around with digests, and I didn't realize that the
reply code was not in the digest code!  I could've sworn it was.  I
suppose that it would be relatively easy to put the reply code in the
digest code, assuming all other things that I suggested in my previous
message be done (inclusion of From: Subject: and other lines that
readnews would want for a news article).

Sorry for the mistake -- it's been awhile since I've looked at the news
sources, or played around with digests.  Just base everything in my
previous message on the inclusion of the reply code in the digest code
and we should be ok.
-- 
Do not meddle in the affairs of wizards,
for they are subtle and quick to anger.

Greg Skinner (gregbo)
{decvax!genrad, allegra, ihnp4}!mit-eddie!gds
gds@mit-eddie.mit.edu