Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2.fluke 9/24/84; site vax4.fluke.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!fluke!hopeful
From: hopeful@fluke.UUCP (Buford Wanttruth)
Newsgroups: net.origins
Subject: A question to me Evolutionknight friends
Message-ID: <2605@vax4.fluke.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 3-Sep-85 21:34:17 EDT
Article-I.D.: vax4.2605
Posted: Tue Sep  3 21:34:17 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 5-Sep-85 02:48:16 EDT
Distribution: net
Organization: John Fluke Mfg. Co., Inc., Everett, WA
Lines: 22

'ere Oy am bein' 'armlously curious loik me good buddy, Buford.  What do you
'knights of the Evolution comp think of this 'ere concept, a quote of a quote
gleaned from Henry Morris' SCIENTIFIC CREATIONISM (p.18)?

"The naive view implies that the universe suddenly came into existence and 
found a complete system of physical laws waiting to be obeyed....Actually it
seems more natural to suppose that the physical universe and the laws of physics
are inter-dependent.  This leads us to expect that, if the universe changes in
the large, then its laws might also change in a way that could not be 
predicted;..."     (W.H. McCrea, "Cosmology after Half a Century, SCIENCE, Vol. 
160 (June 2, 1968), p 1297).


Thanks again tew Rod Foist fer the loan of this spice.


Sincerely,

Jake O'sHonesty


P.S. Beware of Risky Rat-- 'e expects mice tah read 'is bloomin' lips!