Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/17/84; site bcsaic.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!tektronix!uw-beaver!ssc-vax!bcsaic!pamp
From: pamp@bcsaic.UUCP (pam pincha)
Newsgroups: net.origins
Subject: gravity and dinosuars
Message-ID: <274@bcsaic.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 6-Sep-85 15:33:29 EDT
Article-I.D.: bcsaic.274
Posted: Fri Sep  6 15:33:29 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 10-Sep-85 08:46:13 EDT
Distribution: net
Organization: Boeing Computer Services AI Center, Seattle
Lines: 23

-------------------------------------------------
Reply to Ted Holden (My mail connections aren't
working right)
-------------------------------------------------
I cannot respond to an article that I have not read.
What I can respond to is that I do not consider one
article (ESPECIALLY one in which I do not know what
assumptions were made to come up with the calculations
in question) as proof to a major change in geophysics
and physics in general!! Please don't give me article
titles without references as to where to find them.
Please don't say a mathematical proof of one thing
leads to another WITHOUT stating what the basis for
the proof was etc.,etc.,etc. I have found from long
experience such statements lead to little in the way
of valid discussion.(For one thing,I have no reference
of what reason you agree with the article so much
without such information...)

I thank-you for your reply.I just wish I had something
more to work from.
				Pam Pincha-Wagener
(usual disclaimer)