Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site cornell.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!houxm!vax135!cornell!michaels From: michaels@cornell.UUCP (Michael I. Schwartzbach) Newsgroups: net.origins Subject: Dinosaurs in Distress Message-ID: <369@cornell.UUCP> Date: Wed, 11-Sep-85 15:28:05 EDT Article-I.D.: cornell.369 Posted: Wed Sep 11 15:28:05 1985 Date-Received: Thu, 12-Sep-85 12:33:58 EDT Organization: Cornell Univ. CS Dept. Lines: 28 With considerable amusement I have been following the Ted Holden vs. The World debate, and if I understand his postings (which may not be the case) he claims that the gravity on earth in ancient time was felt to be lower, since Saturn was hanging somewhere in the sky and causing tremendous tidal-effects. Now, on the hemisphere closest to Saturn gravity would indeed be lower, but on the far side gravity would in the same manner be much higher (right?). So unless Saturn was in a geosynchronous orbit the poor dinosaurs would we squashed periodically, and hence succumb. If on the other hand Saturn was fixed relatively to earth's position, then only one hemisphere would be inhabited by dinosaurs; in fact, the far hemisphere would be totally void of life except for turtles perhaps. Is that the case? And would any astronomers care to comment on the stability of a system as described above. While I'm at it, let me try to preempt Ted's response to the fact that dinosaurs are found all over the globe: "Saturn's gravity sucked the continents upwards to the low-gravity hemisphere, and when Saturn disappeared they returned to their orginal positions". I think I got the style of reasoning right. I can't wait to hear Ted's response to this, but it will probably be based on an understanding of the universe far exceeding my own and any other mortal man's. Michael I. Schwartzbach CS dept. Cornell Univ. "Everything is possible, but very few things can actually happen!"