Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site umcp-cs.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!umcp-cs!flink From: flink@umcp-cs.UUCP (Paul V Torek) Newsgroups: net.philosophy Subject: Re: LAST WORD on "souls" (I hope!) Message-ID: <1411@umcp-cs.UUCP> Date: Tue, 27-Aug-85 17:02:48 EDT Article-I.D.: umcp-cs.1411 Posted: Tue Aug 27 17:02:48 1985 Date-Received: Thu, 29-Aug-85 21:01:48 EDT References: <581@utastro.UUCP> <1322@umcp-cs.UUCP> <588@utastro.UUCP> <1364@umcp-cs.UUCP> <1589@pyuxd.UUCP> Reply-To: flink@maryland.UUCP (Paul V Torek) Organization: U of Maryland, Computer Science Dept., College Park, MD Lines: 26 Summary: ah, progress In article <1589@pyuxd.UUCP> rlr@pyuxd.UUCP (Rich Rosen) writes: >> BUT: it just ain't implied by a person's existence at time A, and later at >> time B, that he must have existed during the time between. (It happens >> to be always true in the real world, but as a matter of physical law and >> boundary conditions, not as a matter of logic.) [TOREK] > >True, Paul. But what makes the person at time A the same person at time B? >What relates the two "persons" such that they can be said to be the same >person? Well, for example, the person at time B might have the exact same physical structure, molecule by molecule, as the person had at time A. He would then have all the same mental qualities (assuming, as I think we two agree, that Cartesian dualism is wrong). He would then be, for all practical purposes, the same person. I'm not saying that all this is physically possible, of course (but then, I don't believe in Wingate's God). (Technically though, the person at time B (call him Bob) would not be the same person as the one at time A (call him Al), unless he was causally descended from A in such a way that there could not be two identical people produced at time B by the same process. Otherwise, Bob would "merely" be an exact *copy* of Al. I put the word "merely" in scare-quotes because, rationally, it should not make a difference to anyone, including Al, whether Bob will be Al or an exact copy.) --Paul V Torek, umcp-cs!flink