Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site decwrl.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!prls!amdimage!amdcad!decwrl!williams@kirk.DEC (John Williams 223-3402)
From: williams@kirk.DEC (John Williams 223-3402)
Newsgroups: net.philosophy
Subject: Newtonian Mechanics
Message-ID: <151@decwrl.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 26-Aug-85 17:07:19 EDT
Article-I.D.: decwrl.151
Posted: Mon Aug 26 17:07:19 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 30-Aug-85 00:15:30 EDT
Sender: daemon@decwrl.UUCP
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation
Lines: 18


	Back then they didn't call it " Newtonian ". They still call
it mechanics or physics or whatever. If you wish to archive the old
definition of free will, be our guest.

	It's boiling down to you or me, isn't it Rich? You can call it
whatever-the-f*** you want, and I'll still call it free will.

	But tell me honestly, which do you think will be easier
to live with?

	I don't know about you, but I don't think people are that
stupid to confuse free will with the logical extreme you presented
us with. If I find any, I'll send them to you.

						John.

It takes a truly brilliant mind to make a truly brilliant mistake.