Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/3/84; site enmasse.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!zeta!sabre!petrus!bellcore!decvax!genrad!panda!enmasse!mroddy
From: mroddy@enmasse.UUCP (Mark Roddy)
Newsgroups: net.politics.theory
Subject: Re: How governments might be kept from economic intervention
Message-ID: <458@enmasse.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 30-Aug-85 21:42:52 EDT
Article-I.D.: enmasse.458
Posted: Fri Aug 30 21:42:52 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 1-Sep-85 12:42:12 EDT
References: <9563@ucbvax.ARPA> <1106@umcp-cs.UUCP> <10166@ucbvax.ARPA> <245@pedsgd.UUCP> <10203@ucbvax.ARPA> <1724@psuvax1.UUCP>
Organization: Enmasse Computer Corp., Acton, Mass.
Lines: 19

> What about land redistributed via eminent domain?  Should it be returned?
> If yes, what would happen to the existing highways, pipelines etc.?
> I would appreciate your follow up, Barry.  Of course, my intention
> is to voice some "statist" objections.  But if your plan is good, then
> I think you do not be afraid to much.

Yeah, it should be returned. Most of us should go back to where we came from.
The folks who were here first (the natives, remember them?) can try and
pick up where they left off 300 years ago. 

Libertarians can only discuss an abstract society because there ain't
no way its going to work right here and now.

-- 
						Mark Roddy
						Net working,
						Just reading the news.

					(harvard!talcott!panda!enmasse!mroddy)