Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84 exptools; site ihlpg.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!ihlpg!tan From: tan@ihlpg.UUCP (Bill Tanenbaum) Newsgroups: net.politics.theory Subject: Re: Re: Health Care, Wonderful Market fo Message-ID: <1231@ihlpg.UUCP> Date: Thu, 12-Sep-85 13:59:00 EDT Article-I.D.: ihlpg.1231 Posted: Thu Sep 12 13:59:00 1985 Date-Received: Fri, 13-Sep-85 04:29:58 EDT References: <1764@psuvax1.UUCP> <10300@ucbvax.ARPA> <1774@psuvax1.UUCP> <10355@ucbvax.ARPA> Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories Lines: 33 > >[Piotr Berman] > >The most general law is that the market has a tendency > >toward equilibrium: the demand stimulates the prices up, the supply > >stimulates the prices down. Increase of prices may stimulate the > >production, decrease may stimulate removing marginal producers from > >the market. The real problem is that the equilibrium does not imply > >superior fulfillment of social needs. ------- > [Rick McGeer] > This is a common statement of leftwingers, and it is completely meaningless. > What are "social needs"? Who sets them? Why are the demands met by the market > not an adequate reflection of the generalized demands of society, if such > things in fact exist? And how do you propose to measure how well or badly > any system of organizing society meets "social needs"? When, or if, you > can answer these questions, then we'll have something to talk about. Until > then, you're just flaming. -------- Unbelievabe. First, there is the unwarranted ad-hominem characterization of Piotr Berman as a leftwinger, because he thinks there are social needs. By that standard, even Ronald Reagan is a left-winger. Now, about "social needs". How about starting with adequate food, clothing and shelter for all? Almost every non-libertarian would agree with these. Conservatives might stop there, liberals might add a few more, while social democrats would add a lot more. Who decides? Why, the electorate, through its elected representatives, of course. Since social needs are not defined in Libertarian economics, they clearly don't exist. Right, Rick? Market demand may very well be an adequate reflection of the demands of the society. But my demand for food won't give me a supply in Libertaria if I have no money and no job. Guess I will have to hit you over the head and steal yours. Such is Libertaria. -- Bill Tanenbaum - AT&T Bell Labs - Naperville IL ihnp4!ihlpg!tan