Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site pyuxd.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!pyuxww!pyuxd!rlr
From: rlr@pyuxd.UUCP (Rich Rosen)
Newsgroups: net.religion,net.religion.christian
Subject: Re: How come God doesn't affect Dave?
Message-ID: <1662@pyuxd.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 7-Sep-85 20:56:03 EDT
Article-I.D.: pyuxd.1662
Posted: Sat Sep  7 20:56:03 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 9-Sep-85 01:31:48 EDT
References: <305@pyuxn.UUCP> <630@ihu1m.UUCP> <309@pyuxn.UUCP>
Organization: Whatever we're calling ourselves this week
Lines: 14
Xref: watmath net.religion:7558 net.religion.christian:1238

> I'd say this guy is more than a little paranoid. He should see a doctor.
> (I wouldn't be surprised if he's dangerous. I've seen people institutionalized
> for less than that posting.)  [VINCE HATEM, speaking about Paul Zimmerman]

Hmmm.  If Paul Zimmerman is "paranoid" for believing in a god that is evil,
does that make those who believe in a benevolent god equally disturbed and
worthy of institutionalization?  Or "dangerous"?  Is it just because his god
is different from the one they worship that results in the judgment that Paul
should see a doctor.

So much for religious tolerance...
-- 
"iY AHORA, INFORMACION INTERESANTE ACERCA DE... LA LLAMA!"
	Rich Rosen    ihnp4!pyuxd!rlr