Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site ccice5.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!whuxlm!harpo!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!rochester!ritcv!ccice5!rdz
From: rdz@ccice5.UUCP (Robert D. Zarcone)
Newsgroups: net.politics,net.religion
Subject: Re: Re: "Secular Humanism" banned in the US Schools.
Message-ID: <909@ccice5.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 6-Sep-85 13:03:55 EDT
Article-I.D.: ccice5.909
Posted: Fri Sep  6 13:03:55 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 9-Sep-85 02:25:23 EDT
References: <4141@alice.UUCP> <938@bunker.UUCP> <1544@pyuxd.UUCP>, <952@bunker.UUCP> <4217@alice.UUCP>
Organization: CCI Central Engineering, Rochester, NY
Lines: 21
Xref: watmath net.politics:10861 net.religion:7561

> 
> 	The correctness of their attacks are not an issue,
> as the mere threat of a lawsuit is enough to ruin any individual's
> credit rating, have their house repossessed, their insurances
> cancelled, and their life irrevocably ruined.

I am NOT posting this as a stand either way on the subject at hand.  I
just wanted to point out that, at least in New York, the above statement
is just not true.  I speak from over four years of experience in credit
and banking.
> 
> 	Such actions, unfortunately not redressable in our current
> legal system, are why I object to this act of Congress. 

Again, if you mean in conjunction with the above mentioned lawsuit, not so
in New York.  You can bring a counter-suit against the attacking party.

If I misinterpreted your remarks to mean other than you had intended, please
accept my appology.

	*** REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR MESSAGE ***