Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version nyu B notes v1.5 12/10/84; site csd2.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!zeta!sabre!petrus!bellcore!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!cmcl2!csd2!meth From: meth@csd2.UUCP (Asher Meth) Newsgroups: net.religion.jewish Subject: Jews and ISRAEL Message-ID: <3780073@csd2.UUCP> Date: Mon, 26-Aug-85 12:57:00 EDT Article-I.D.: csd2.3780073 Posted: Mon Aug 26 12:57:00 1985 Date-Received: Wed, 28-Aug-85 10:56:43 EDT Organization: New York University Lines: 82 NOTE : Extracted from an article about "Jews and Israel", including relations with South Africa. >... This is aside from that if every Jew in America went to >Israel to stay the result would be one impossibly overcrowded "homeland." > Daniel R. Levy levy@ttrdc I beg to differ with you, on several levels. (1) The land of Israel, Eretz Yisrael, is referred to as "eretz tzvi", the land of (which is like a) deer. It looks small, but it is like the skin of a deer. Namely, while on the deer, the skin stretches to cover his whole body. Once the soul has been removed from the deer, the skin seems to shrink greatly; it cannot be stretched to fit the body that it once held. So it is with the holy land, Eretz Yisrael. When Jews live there, and follow the teachings of HaShem, it can support any number of them (no matter how large) for then they embody the spirit of the land. When Jews do not live there, it just cannot support many inhabitants. They will always struggle to find enough food, and may have to live like nomads, travelling from place to place, in order to survive. It is interesting to note that there are people who live like that in Eretz Yisrael itself, today, in the here and now (i.e., this is fact; note the Bedouins). (2) The British government imposed quotas on the number of Jews permitted to enter Israel, turning away many who had no place to go (e.g., during WWII, earlier, too) - a historical fact. Besides the reason of "not wanting to upset the Arabs, and not upsetting a 'balance' in the area, will the world say OK?" (terms we hear all too often from both sides of the Mediterranean), the British conducted a scientific study to determine just how many people could live in this area of land, given its natural resources, climate, etc. With the results of this study (a proper scientific study, as far as I have heard), the British could easily justify closing the borders of Israel to unwanted Jewish refugees. The land just could not support more than the paltry sum of approximately 300,000 people. You just cannot overrun the place with hundreds of thousands more people, no less millions. Was this study correct ? Yes, and No. Yes : Scientifically, and with respect to any other nation (non Jewish), the land could not support more than the said 300,000. No : The land of Israel is not like all other lands. It is intrinsically tied to the Jewish people. When the Jewish people live in Israel, it can support any number of them, millions, too. (Today's Jewish population in Israel is about 3 million, if I am not mistaken - 10 times as much as the British report said that it could hold !) (3) Have any of you out there ever been to Israel ? Are you familiar with its topography ? Have you seen all those hills, everywhere (except on the coastal plain) ? Have you seen those cities/towns that exist and that are being built on those hills ? Empty, barren hills, unpopulated for years and years, full of big rocks, for miles and miles, as far as the eye can see. As you drive along the road, winding around the mountains, all you see are empty hills, or hills with recently built towns (read, settlements); and plenty of room to spare. One hill may be built up; the surrounding ones are still barren. Do not let the propaganda fool you into believing that all new settlements are built upon the ruins of old, established Arab villages, whose residents are being sent to live in delapidated refugee camps, under the friendly protection of that great arm of the world peace-maker and peace-keeper UNRWA (United Nations Relief and Works Association - or something similar). It is just not true. Just as my eyes have seen it, so can yours. And it is really a beautiful sight to see - pioneers, going out and building the land. It should sound quite familiar to the American ear - the spirit of hard working pioneers is what built this great country in which we live today (the USA). (4) Concerning those empty, barren hills, on which cities are rising : The Talmud makes mention of a Jewish king who had established on each of 60 hills, 60 cities - an enormous population. (I think that it may be found in Gittin, among the discussions of the destruction of the Temple.) When my father viewed these barren hills for the first time in his life last summer, he commented - now I can begin to understand how that king had such a great population living in these hills. The topography is such that you can build all the way up the hill, and all around, too. Picture a city with many apartment buildings (e.g., New York - I'm familiar with it). Picture these apartment buildings rising on a hill, on all sides of the hill. You can fit many more units on a hill than you can on a flat piece of land. I think that I have said enough. Not only would it not be impossible for all the Jews to fit into our homeland of Israel, there would be plenty of space left over for many more people. Asher Meth ....... meth@nyu-csd2.arpa ....... allegra!cmcl2!csd2!meth