Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version nyu B notes v1.5 12/10/84; site csd2.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!csd2!martillo From: martillo@csd2.UUCP (Joachim Martillo) Newsgroups: net.religion.jewish Subject: Re: Julie Harazduk and the Trinity Message-ID: <3780082@csd2.UUCP> Date: Fri, 6-Sep-85 00:07:00 EDT Article-I.D.: csd2.3780082 Posted: Fri Sep 6 00:07:00 1985 Date-Received: Sun, 8-Sep-85 10:30:47 EDT References: <3780072@csd2.UUCP> Organization: New York University Lines: 45 /* csd2:net.religion.jewish / rlr@pyuxd.UUCP (Rich Rosen) / 12:42 pm Aug 27, 1985 */ >> Normally, I do not reply to this type of article but Julie Harazduk >> has claimed to be Jewish. Generally, I consider the Jewishness of >> Ashkenazim suspect unless they are acting in a recognizably Jewish way >> by Sefardi standards. Most of what most Ashkenazim consider >> Jewishness is basically some barbaric customs picked up from German >> and Slavic peasants over the past couple of centuries. Also many of >> the ideas which Ashkenazim consider Jewish religious ideas in fact >> come from Christianity. [MARTILLO] >If I were to say to Martillo that the Jewishness of Sefardim is questionable >at best because what Sefardim consider Jewishness is basically some barbaric >set of customs picked up in a variety of countries over the last couple >of centuries, and that I would not refer to his actionsas "Jewish" unless >he was acting in a recognizably Jewish way by Ashkenazic standards, he would >probably call me a name like "vusvus". In the original article I unfortunately used Jewishness in two senses: Jewish lineage and the inheritance of the assembly of Jacob (Jewish faith and tradition). As for the second usage, Sefardi Jewish customs are fairly homogenous over an extremely wide geographic area among an extremely diverse group of non-Jews. Except in a few specific cases borrowing from non-Jews is extremely unlikely origin for Sefardic Jewish custom; therefore, when Sefardi and Ashkenazi custom differ, a Christian or pagan origin for the Ashkenazi custom can usually be found. As for lineage, strong evidence exists that the Ashkenazi population in Europe absorbed many Karaites, Orthodox, and pietist protestants. Therefore, Ashkenazi rabbis like Haim Druckman should be the last to run around casting doubt on the lineage of Ethiopians Jews (at least they don't look slavic like many Ashkenazim). As long as Druckman and his ilk continue this rude, crude and immature behavior (which Sefardim outgrew over a century ago), I will continue to point out the dubious Jewish lineage of Ashkenazim. Psychology, Druckman et al. worry so much about Ethiopian Jewish lineage in order to convince themselves of the purity of their own dubious lineage. Rosen should be pleased. He was upset when I said he was Jewish because his mother was Jewish. Now I can logically consider him non-Jewish. Rosen is such an ignoramus that there must have been a tradition of his ignorance. Such a tradition of ignorance I take as prima facie evidence of the Rosen family's non-Jewish origin.