Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site watdaisy.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!watnot!watdaisy!gjerawlins From: gjerawlins@watdaisy.UUCP (Gregory J.E. Rawlins) Newsgroups: net.sf-lovers Subject: Re: Robinson (really about facial expressions) Message-ID: <7377@watdaisy.UUCP> Date: Mon, 26-Aug-85 17:59:40 EDT Article-I.D.: watdaisy.7377 Posted: Mon Aug 26 17:59:40 1985 Date-Received: Tue, 27-Aug-85 01:28:23 EDT References: <3407@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU> Reply-To: gjerawlins@watdaisy.UUCP (Gregory J.E. Rawlins) Organization: U of Waterloo, Ontario Lines: 40 Summary: In article <3407@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU> godwin@uci-icse writes: >From: Dave Godwin >[........] >description. Perhaps we should begin using the suggested method of >inserting facial expressions as comments . This would cause less >confusion over all < cough, gag >. Ahh good! this makes three of us [Only interested in pure information in net news? HIT YOUR 'N' KEY NOW!] >[........] > Hey, so how do you spell a >raspberry ? > Dave A weighty and important question . After many seconds of contemplation and consultation with our local guru of colloquialisms i came up with or or or . the crazy next to me just suggested (i don't know what's wrong with him...i wasn't expecting a bloody Spanish Inquistion!....<>). By the way, for those who have no idea what's going on here, the original comment was a suggestion of mine that we (the net) adopt the convention of adding facial expressions to our ruminations to make our meanings (or lack thereof) painfully obvious. Can anyone suggest any minuses to this idea? (aside from the initial clumsyness of expression) (another thing: i ripped it off from _Valentina_ by Delaney and Steigler) greg. -- Gregory J.E. Rawlins, Department of Computer Science, U. Waterloo gjerawlins%watdaisy@waterloo.csnet gjerawlins%watdaisy%waterloo.csnet@csnet-relay.arpa {allegra|clyde|linus|utzoo|inhp4|decvax}!watmath!watdaisy!gjerawlins