Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: $Revision: 1.6.2.16 $; site ISM780.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!zeta!sabre!petrus!bellcore!decvax!cca!ISM780!joan From: joan@ISM780.UUCP Newsgroups: net.singles Subject: Re: Orphaned Response Message-ID: <33100027@ISM780.UUCP> Date: Sat, 24-Aug-85 02:45:00 EDT Article-I.D.: ISM780.33100027 Posted: Sat Aug 24 02:45:00 1985 Date-Received: Wed, 28-Aug-85 01:56:41 EDT References: <132@ssc-vax.UUCP> Lines: 40 Nf-ID: #R:ssc-vax:-13200:ISM780:33100027:177600:1479 Nf-From: ISM780!joan Aug 24 02:45:00 1985 ************************* DISCLAIMER! ************************** I'm 20. I'm a virgin. I've never been in love. I probably don't know what I'm talking about. ********************** END OF DISCLAIMER ************************** >> [Elizabeth] >> I actually wish that I were more mysterious (maybe I'm more so >> than I think I am) because I think that it's a very sexy >> trait. > [Jeff] > I've been told that I have very intense and intriguing eyes and > that such mysterious men are quite attractive etc etc. Gee, I've never cared for mysterious people. I've always felt that the goal in any relationship (friend/family/spouse) should be to know the person as well as possible. If you ask me, anything that stands in the way of that goal is *bad*. I'm not intrigued by people who don't open up. I like to know what makes somebody happy and what makes them mad. Call me a foolish child, but I've always thought that a love relationship should be more of a family-type thing. Should family members be "mysterious" with each other? ****************************************************************************** Joan "the VMS group is moving mountains" Alexander Interactive Systems, Santa Monica, CA cca!ima!ism780!alexander vortex!ism780!alexander "Opinions expressed herein were not mine originally, but were forced on me at gunpoint by the Interactive Systems Corporation"