Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site unc.unc.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!zeta!sabre!petrus!bellcore!decvax!mcnc!unc!fsks
From: fsks@unc.UUCP (Frank Silbermann)
Newsgroups: net.singles
Subject: Re: A Question for the Women(Color Analysis)
Message-ID: <235@unc.unc.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 26-Aug-85 20:40:56 EDT
Article-I.D.: unc.235
Posted: Mon Aug 26 20:40:56 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 28-Aug-85 10:52:56 EDT
References: <5908@utzoo.UUCP>
Reply-To: fsks@unc.UUCP (Frank Silbermann)
Organization: CS Dept, U. of N. Carolina, Chapel Hill
Lines: 17
Summary: 

>In article <1372@uwmacc.UUCP> oyster@uwmacc.UUCP (Vicious Oyster) writes:
>> I don't really want to start yet another long-ranging argument
>> where neither side will change, but I'd like to respectfully submit
>> that trying to look good *period* sounds counterproductive.

In article <5908@utzoo.UUCP> nonh@utzoo.UUCP (Chris Robertson) writes:
>Hell, what's wrong with a little vanity?  If I enjoy other people's
>aesthetic apperance, why shouldn't I enjoy my own?  *I* didn't make my
>face or body, why should'nt I try to look (what *I* think is) good?
>You lot sure are a set of damn dull Puritan dogs, y'know.

I take a more practical attitude.  I have long noticed that society
is kinder to good looking people.  Articles in "Psychology Today"
confirm this impression.  It is in my self-interest to take any
reasonable measures that would make me better looking.

	Frank Silbermann