Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site baylor.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!think!harvard!seismo!ut-sally!ut-ngp!shell!neuro1!baylor!peter
From: peter@baylor.UUCP (Peter da Silva)
Newsgroups: net.unix
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Alternate Shells
Message-ID: <587@baylor.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 29-Aug-85 16:30:22 EDT
Article-I.D.: baylor.587
Posted: Thu Aug 29 16:30:22 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 10-Sep-85 03:43:11 EDT
References: <242@cmu-cs-h.ARPA> <620@ucsfcgl.UUCP>
Organization: The Power Elite, Houston, TX
Lines: 13

> (b) We saw little reason for anybody to use any other shell (you must
> remember that csh was new then, and there were no other alternative
> shells).  The only other common shell used was a basic+ interpreter for
> one business class, which was given by the administrator when the class
> accounts were set up.

What about psh? I seem to remember running into a couple of people who
preferred it to csh. I thought they were crazy but that doesn't mean
anything. I frequently think I'm crazy.
-- 
	Peter (Made in Australia) da Silva
		UUCP: ...!shell!neuro1!{hyd-ptd,baylor,datafac}!peter
		MCI: PDASILVA; CIS: 70216,1076