Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site druxo.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!harvard!talcott!panda!genrad!decvax!tektronix!uw-beaver!cornell!vax135!houxm!mtuxo!drutx!druxo!nap From: nap@druxo.UUCP (ParsonsNA) Newsgroups: net.women Subject: What's net.women for, anyway? Message-ID: <962@druxo.UUCP> Date: Sun, 25-Aug-85 20:55:40 EDT Article-I.D.: druxo.962 Posted: Sun Aug 25 20:55:40 1985 Date-Received: Thu, 29-Aug-85 08:15:32 EDT Organization: AT&T Information Systems Laboratories, Denver Lines: 31 > ...Was there any other group > where the *majority* of the people on the net were told that they were > not to post to it so that the minority... > ...could have the group all to themselves? It was my understanding that, except for the "general" groups, each group is intended for a minority of people on the net who share a particular interest. Hence, the answer to the question is "Yes, the majority is told not to post to a newsgroup so that the minority for whom it was created can have it all to themselves." So, the question, it seems to me, is "What is the common interest for which net.women exists?" Is it supposed to be a forum for saying anything one wishes about women? For slinging mud at those with whom we disagree? For women to share experiences and encouragement? Many of us think it should be the latter, with, perhaps an opportunity for others to "listen in" to what women are thinking, feeling, and doing. This is not women asking for special privileges. It is a group of people (male and female) who share a particular interest asking that the group not be dominated by people who are not contributing to that interest. It is a group of people frustrated because it really does appear that we are being discriminated against on the net...we are not accorded the same courtesy that other "minorities" (subscribers to net.politics, net.religion, etc.) are given. Nancy Parsons AT&T ISL