Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site scirtp.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!whuxl!whuxlm!akgua!mcnc!rti-sel!scirtp!todd
From: todd@scirtp.UUCP (Todd Jones)
Newsgroups: net.women
Subject: Re: Imagine a non-sexist society...
Message-ID: <367@scirtp.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 28-Aug-85 18:22:49 EDT
Article-I.D.: scirtp.367
Posted: Wed Aug 28 18:22:49 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 31-Aug-85 03:43:21 EDT
References: <931@oddjob.UUCP> <235@whuts.UUCP> <5625@tekecs.UUCP> <241@whuts.UUCP>
Distribution: net
Organization: SCI Systems, Research Triangle Park, NC
Lines: 23

> 
> In spite of being crushed by the weight of the dictionaries thrown
> at me, I stand by my original posting. I think life would be boring.
> Or oppressive. I don't think that the feminists really advocate a
> non-sexist society--I think that they want a non-sexual society.
> 
> Why do I think this? Could be I'm a macho asshole.  

Sounds as if you feel threatened by the concept.

My concept of a non-sexist society (caveat: I'm Male)
is one in which every individual could choose a lifestyle
and would not be hindered in pursuing that lifestyle
on the basis of gender.

What is so boring or oppressive or non-sexual about that?

   |||||||
   ||   ||
   [ O-O ]       Todd Jones
    \ ^ /        {decvax,akgua}!mcnc!rti-sel!scirtp!todd      
    | ~ |
    |___|        SCI Systems Inc. doesn't necessarily agree with Todd.