Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/12/84; site aero.ARPA
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!qantel!hplabs!sdcrdcf!trwrb!trwrba!aero!foy
From: foy@aero.ARPA (Richard Foy)
Newsgroups: net.abortion
Subject: Re: Equal Access to Pleasure
Message-ID: <421@aero.ARPA>
Date: Tue, 10-Sep-85 16:16:54 EDT
Article-I.D.: aero.421
Posted: Tue Sep 10 16:16:54 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 15-Sep-85 12:09:20 EDT
References: <1261@brl-tgr.ARPA>
Reply-To: foy@aero.UUCP (Richard Foy)
Distribution: net
Organization: The Aerospace Corp., El Segundo, CA
Lines: 25
Summary: 

In article <1261@brl-tgr.ARPA> matt@brl-tgr.ARPA (Matthew Rosenblatt ) writes:
>Since "Equal Access to Pleasure" was MY article title, let me
>state my position on the argument between R. Frank and unixcorn:
>
>Consistent "Responsibility" positions:
>
>	1)  No abortion on demand for the pregnant woman;
>	2)  Enforcement of the father's obligation to support his child.
>
>
>I support the consistent "Responsibility" positions, as does the Reagan
>administration.  My original article included an expression of the
>misgivings I feel, as a civil libertarian, about the Government's use
>of Social Security numbers and computer data banks to track people down
>for ANY PURPOSE, however laudable, when the data were collected for
>another purpose.  I'm a pro-lifer, but I sure wouldn't want to live in
>a society where the Government kept track of the name and location of
>every pregnant woman (as in Bolshevik China), with a network of informants
>ready to rat on her if they thought she was planning to abort herself.
>
>					-- Matt Rosenblatt
How do you propose insuring the males carry out their responsiblity? Can
this be done within a cival libertarian perspective? 


Brought to you by Super Global Mega Corp .com