Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site pyuxd.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!pyuxww!pyuxd!rlr From: rlr@pyuxd.UUCP (Rich Rosen) Newsgroups: net.abortion Subject: Re: Planned Parenthood posting Message-ID: <1705@pyuxd.UUCP> Date: Sun, 15-Sep-85 21:26:45 EDT Article-I.D.: pyuxd.1705 Posted: Sun Sep 15 21:26:45 1985 Date-Received: Tue, 17-Sep-85 04:21:15 EDT References: <786@mit-vax.UUCP> <11483@rochester.UUCP> <1223@ihlpg.UUCP> <1670@pyuxd.UUCP> <11615@rochester.UUCP> Organization: Whatever we're calling ourselves this week Lines: 37 >>I think we've >>seen enough examples of Ray's illiteracy when it comes to the issues (in >>net.religion, he claimed that the USA was founded as a Christian country and >>that we should "return" to that). What scares me is not that he is a standout >>crackpot. What scares me is that I fear he is typical. Isn't Marcel Simon >>having it out with someone else in this newsgroup who claims "sex outside >>marriage is wrong regardless of religion, because ... uh ..."? This is what >>is scary. This sort of "thinking" is the status quo. [ROSEN] > You've stated a contradiction here. How can I be a standout crackpot if as > you say I am typical? [RAY] Are you out to prove me right? I said rather clearly that what scares me is NOT your being a standout crackpot, but rather your being quite typical. And you later said that you knew this, so whom are you kidding? I'm beginning to think that perhaps you are just trying to make people who who hold positions such as the ones you have described look foolish. Don't bother. It's easy enough to show the flaws in such beliefs without lampooning them. > Typical in terms of representing the nation's people as a whole? If I am the > status quo, then it is you and your cronies such as the likes of Charlie and > Richie that stand out. (Charlie? Richie?) Status quo's have been wrong before. And they will continue to be wrong in the future. It is blind acceptance that the status quo is "right" that destroys civilizations in the long run. > As usual, the central topic has been avoided and side issues focused upon. Of course. We WERE talking about an article of yours, weren't we? When was the last time an article of yours came anywhere near discussing abortion at all? -- "to be nobody but yourself in a world which is doing its best night and day to make you like everybody else means to fight the hardest battle any human being can fight and never stop fighting." - e. e. cummings Rich Rosen ihnp4!pyuxd!rlr Brought to you by Super Global Mega Corp .com