Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site cylixd.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!akgub!cylixd!charli
From: charli@cylixd.UUCP (Charli Phillips)
Newsgroups: net.abortion
Subject: Re: Now we can get somewhere, I hope!
Message-ID: <285@cylixd.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 16-Sep-85 16:25:57 EDT
Article-I.D.: cylixd.285
Posted: Mon Sep 16 16:25:57 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 18-Sep-85 04:49:34 EDT
References: <1247@ihlpg.UUCP>
Reply-To: charli@cylixd.UUCP (Charli Phillips)
Organization: RCA Cylix Communications , Memphis, TN
Lines: 24
Summary: 

In article <1247@ihlpg.UUCP> tan@ihlpg.UUCP (Bill Tanenbaum) writes:
>How about some ground rules for a new discussion?  I would suggest the
>following, and hope that some of the pro-lifers will take me up.
>
>1) No arguments about whether the fetus is human, alive, a person,
>a non-person, etc.  
>
>2) No arguments based on God or religious faith.  
>
>3) Discussion of special cases, such as rape victims and
>fetuses with incurable fatal diseases, is permitted.
>
>4) An agreement that what happens to the aborted fetus AFTER it is dead is
>irrelevant.  
>
>5) No name calling or ad-hominem attacks.  
>-- 
>Bill Tanenbaum - AT&T Bell Labs - Naperville IL  ihnp4!ihlpg!tan

Not only do I *like* the above rules, I would like to see some way of
making them automatically appear every time someone starts into this
newsgroup!  (Let's hear it for *civilized discourse*!)

		charli


Brought to you by Super Global Mega Corp .com