Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site cylixd.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!akgub!cylixd!charli
From: charli@cylixd.UUCP (Charli Phillips)
Newsgroups: net.abortion
Subject: Re: I was a teenaged pregancy
Message-ID: <319@cylixd.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 31-Dec-69 18:59:59 EDT
Article-I.D.: cylixd.319
Posted: Wed Dec 31 18:59:59 1969
Date-Received: Sat, 28-Sep-85 06:59:43 EDT
References: <711@gitpyr.UUCP> <390@scirtp.UUCP> <5839@cbscc.UUCP> <740@gitpyr.UUCP> <5853@cbscc.UUCP> <749@gitpyr.UUCP> <316@gcc-bill.ARPA> <1286@ihlpg.UUCP>
Reply-To: charli@cylixd.UUCP (Charli Phillips)
Distribution: net
Organization: RCA Cylix Communications , Memphis, TN
Lines: 17
Summary: 

>I'm glad you agree the life of the mother is more important than the
>life of the unborn.  It should then follow that you believe the unborn
>should not have the same FULL protection of the law that born human
>beings do, i.e., abortion should not legally be considered murder.
>You have conceded that the unborn should not legally be considered
>human beings, since if they were, there would be no reason to prefer
>the mother's life to the life of the unborn.
>If I have put words in your mouth, please tell me where I went wrong.
>-- 
>Bill Tanenbaum - AT&T Bell Labs - Naperville IL  ihnp4!ihlpg!tan

The position of virtually all pro-lifers is that if the fetus threatens
the life of the mother, then the fetus's life may be taken in 
self-defense.  This is not the same thing as saying that the fetus
is not human. 

		charli


Brought to you by Super Global Mega Corp .com