Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site cbscc.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!cbsck!cbscc!pmd From: pmd@cbscc.UUCP (Paul M. Dubuc) Newsgroups: net.abortion Subject: Re: Why is it? Message-ID: <5994@cbscc.UUCP> Date: Fri, 27-Sep-85 08:30:53 EDT Article-I.D.: cbscc.5994 Posted: Fri Sep 27 08:30:53 1985 Date-Received: Sun, 29-Sep-85 05:16:54 EDT References: <239@tekig5.UUCP> <862@mit-vax.UUCP> <321@cylixd.UUCP> Reply-To: pmd@cbscc.UUCP (Paul M. Dubuc) Distribution: net Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories , Columbus Lines: 23 In article <321@cylixd.UUCP> charli@cylixd.UUCP (Charli Phillips) writes: >>>Why is it the most outspoken and prolific writers in the >>>pro-life camp (in this forum) are men. I realize men outnumber >>>women by quite a margin on the net, but where are the female counterparts >>>of the Pauls, Garys, and Mikes?? [David Hayes] >> >>They're at home, barefoot and (or course) pregnant. I don't think they'd >>be allowed to use a computer if they knew how. [Charles Forsythe] > >Charles, where's the smiley face? > >If you were serious (and I hope you weren't), that remark is bigoted and >offensive. You owe a lot of women an apology. > > charli Not to mention some men (not that we'd expect it to happen). One of the "Pauls", -- Paul Dubuc cbscc!pmd Brought to you by Super Global Mega Corp .com