Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site uscvax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!hplabs!sdcrdcf!uscvax!phillips
From: phillips@uscvax.UUCP (Marlene Phillips)
Newsgroups: net.abortion
Subject: Re: Why is it?
Message-ID: <9@uscvax.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 30-Sep-85 16:10:06 EDT
Article-I.D.: uscvax.9
Posted: Mon Sep 30 16:10:06 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 4-Oct-85 06:28:34 EDT
References: <239@tekig5.UUCP> <862@mit-vax.UUCP> <321@cylixd.UUCP>
Reply-To: phillips@usc-cse.UUCP (Marlene Phillips)
Distribution: net
Organization: CS&CE Depts, U.S.C., Los Angeles, CA
Lines: 24
Summary: 

In article <321@cylixd.UUCP> charli@cylixd.UUCP (Charli Phillips) writes:
>>>Why is it the most outspoken and prolific writers in the 
>>>pro-life camp (in this forum) are men.  I realize men outnumber
>>>women by quite a margin on the net, but where are the female counterparts
>>>of the Pauls, Garys, and Mikes?? [David Hayes]
>>
>>They're at home, barefoot and (or course) pregnant. I don't think they'd
>>be allowed to use a computer if they knew how.  [Charles Forsythe]
>

It's true, I'm neither outspoken nor a prolific writer in this
newsgroup, but I am a woman who is definitely pro-life.  By the
way, I am not at home (although I would like to work at home if the
phone hookup charges were not so expensive), I am not currently
barefoot, (although I do sometimes take off my shoes), and I am not
currently pregnant.  As for your final point, I am working on a
Ph.D. in Computer Science, which may not necessarily indicate the
computer know-how that many of you have, but I think it at least
indicates that I am allowed to use a computer, at least occasionally.

I am not asking for an apology, I'm just trying to provide some
relevant information.

			Marlene Phillips


Brought to you by Super Global Mega Corp .com