Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site mordor.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!ucbvax!ucdavis!lll-crg!mordor!sjc From: sjc@mordor.UUCP (Steve Correll) Newsgroups: net.audio Subject: Re: No. of D/A converters, some players... Message-ID: <3569@mordor.UUCP> Date: Wed, 18-Sep-85 13:01:23 EDT Article-I.D.: mordor.3569 Posted: Wed Sep 18 13:01:23 1985 Date-Received: Fri, 20-Sep-85 04:45:45 EDT References: <561@petrus.UUCP> Distribution: net Organization: S-1 Project, LLNL Lines: 26 > I have learned that the D/A converter in the cd player is the thingy that > takes the cd disk information and converts it into music. Now, I have also > heard that: > 1) Having two is fairly important > 2) Not having two doesn't really make a difference. > > What are the other opinions out there (and why)? I firmly believe every CD player should have at least one D/A converter. A player with only one must switch the output of the DAC alternately between the left and right channels, probably using a FET analog switch. Two oft-stated objections to this are that it delays one channel compared to the other, and that it introduces transients. The answer to the first objection is that the delay is uniform and equivalent to sitting 1/3 inch closer to one loudspeaker than to the other; few of us position ourselves on the sofa with this much accuracy to begin with. The answer to the second objection is that the A/D converters used in generating the CD in the first place may well use similar analog switch technology; that the transients are so high in frequency that the post-DAC filter (often called, loosely, an "anti-aliasing" filter) gets rid of them along with the images generated by the sampling process; and that it is in the nature of the DAC itself to generate similar transients. -- --Steve Correll sjc@s1-c.ARPA, ...!decvax!decwrl!mordor!sjc, or ...!ucbvax!dual!mordor!sjc Brought to you by Super Global Mega Corp .com