Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site gymble.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!ucbvax!ucdavis!lll-crg!gymble!dday
From: dday@gymble.UUCP (Dennis Doubleday)
Newsgroups: net.audio
Subject: Re: cost of LP's--A detailed breakdown
Message-ID: <360@gymble.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 30-Sep-85 10:32:49 EDT
Article-I.D.: gymble.360
Posted: Mon Sep 30 10:32:49 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 4-Oct-85 03:54:44 EDT
References: <830@homxb.UUCP> <512@moncol.UUCP> <841@homxb.UUCP> <12329@Glacier.ARPA>
Reply-To: dday@gymble.UUCP (Dennis Doubleday)
Organization: U of Maryland, Laboratory for Parallel Computation, C.P., MD
Lines: 12

In article <12329@Glacier.ARPA> reid@Glacier.UUCP (Brian Reid) writes:
>Our records are manufactured by the same plant in Arizona that
>presses Angel records, which is to say the very highest quality. One of the
 
I enjoyed reading your breakdown of LP production costs.  It was very
informative and interesting.  I can't agree with the above statement, 
however.  I own around 200 Angel LPs and the pressings are almost uniformly
of lower quality than DGG, Phillips, and many other European and audiophile
labels.  (The reason I have bought so many is that Angel is best source
of 20th century British music--can't always get EMI.)  I would be willing
to concede, though, that they are the highest-quality pressings among
large American record companies.


Brought to you by Super Global Mega Corp .com