Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.7.0.8 $; site uiucdcsp
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcsp!nowicki
From: nowicki@uiucdcsp.CS.UIUC.EDU
Newsgroups: net.audio
Subject: Re: My damn (new) cartridge don`t work!
Message-ID: <3900004@uiucdcsp>
Date: Thu, 3-Oct-85 11:21:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: uiucdcsp.3900004
Posted: Thu Oct  3 11:21:00 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 5-Oct-85 06:28:16 EDT
References: <3204@teklabs.UUCP>
Lines: 21
Nf-ID: #R:teklabs.UUCP:-320400:uiucdcsp:3900004:000:904
Nf-From: uiucdcsp.CS.UIUC.EDU!nowicki    Oct  3 10:21:00 1985


I agree about the Grado.  If a cartridge is over-priced for what you get its
the Grado.  (although the Grado is good if you like lots of "highs" but at
what I think is a sacrifice of the midrange). I own one anyway.  (Its the
cheap model on a second table).

But after hearing the better Grado (a G+{something}- new name now I bet) on
a friends table for a year or so, I compared prices and got what I think is
a better sounding cartridge for a better price - a Signet.

The Signet also produced a much more impressive affect than the Grado with
the sonic-hologram unit. (does that say anything about separation?)

I guess its to each his own when buying these things.



----------
Tony Nowicki                            ARPA:  nowicki@uiucdcsb.CS.UIUC.EDU
U. of Illinois, Urbana                  UUCP:  {decvax, ihnp4}!uiucdcs!nowicki
Department of C.S., AI Lab.             CSNET: nowicki@uiuc.csnet


Brought to you by Super Global Mega Corp .com