Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.7.0.8 $; site convexs
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!convex!convexs!ayers
From: ayers@convexs.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.books
Subject: Re: Feminist Reading Material Follo
Message-ID: <6000007@convexs>
Date: Tue, 17-Sep-85 11:15:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: convexs.6000007
Posted: Tue Sep 17 11:15:00 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 19-Sep-85 04:58:00 EDT
References: <16306@watmath.UUCP>
Lines: 37
Nf-ID: #R:watmath.UUCP:-1630600:convexs:6000007:000:944
Nf-From: convexs.UUCP!ayers    Sep 17 10:15:00 1985


>An interesting point about "woman writers" that I've noticed in
>net.sf-lovers.  When someone prefers the work of female authors
>to that of male authors, the person says, "I like women writers."
>When someone prefers the work of male authors to that of female
>authors, the person says, "I don't like women writers."  For all
>the progress we have made, female authors are still the anomaly
>that requires comment.



I don't like "women writers"  --  I also don't like "kids".

I do like "writers" and "people" of either sex and all ages.  

I'm willing to allow for experience levels and viewpoints, but 
I just don't care for closed-end systems.



("Toto, I don't think we're in Kansas anymore...")


					:::::::::::::::::::
						::
						::
					   ::::::::::::
						::
						::
					:::::::::::::::::::
					::		 ::
					::  :::::::::::	 ::
					::	      :	 ::
					::		 ::
					::  :::::::::::	 ::
					::	      :	 ::
					::		 ::


Brought to you by Super Global Mega Corp .com