Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 alpha 4/15/85; site loral.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!qantel!hplabs!sdcrdcf!sdcsvax!sdcc3!sdcc6!loral!pavo From: pavo@loral.UUCP (Repo Man) Newsgroups: net.columbia Subject: Re: More Newsgroup Changes Message-ID: <916@loral.UUCP> Date: Thu, 12-Sep-85 17:02:22 EDT Article-I.D.: loral.916 Posted: Thu Sep 12 17:02:22 1985 Date-Received: Wed, 18-Sep-85 04:17:33 EDT References: <289@sesame.UUCP> <8500011@uiucdcs> <10307@ucbvax.ARPA> Reply-To: pavo@loral.UUCP (Repo Man) Organization: Edge City Rumor Control Lines: 10 Keywords: it ain't broken...so don't fix it In article <10307@ucbvax.ARPA> fair@ucbvax.ARPA (Erik E. Fair) writes: >I repeat, what's wrong with net.space.shuttle? It is an appropriate >name, and it is a separate group, so you don't have to wade through >net.space to read net.space.shuttle. > > Erik E. Fair ucbvax!fair fair@ucbarpa.BERKELEY.EDU I say, 'net.columbia' has been adequate for years now and it works just fine so what's all this debate about anyway? Let's get on with shuttle- related discussions, ok? Brought to you by Super Global Mega Corp .com