Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site k.cs.cmu.edu.ARPA Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!qantel!dual!lll-crg!gymble!umcp-cs!seismo!rochester!pt.cs.cmu.edu!k.cs.cmu.edu!tim From: tim@k.cs.cmu.edu.ARPA (Tim Maroney) Newsgroups: net.comics Subject: Re: Heavy winds and heavy talk Message-ID: <580@k.cs.cmu.edu.ARPA> Date: Wed, 2-Oct-85 19:58:46 EDT Article-I.D.: k.580 Posted: Wed Oct 2 19:58:46 1985 Date-Received: Sun, 6-Oct-85 05:17:08 EDT References: <596@decwrl.UUCP> Organization: Carnegie-Mellon University, Networking Lines: 24 I usually don't respond to anyone who finishes with "Think about it", but what the hey, my standards have been slipping lately.... There are several reasons why I feel that such common comic book scenes as deep emotional discussions in the middle of a whirlwind, or simultaneously emoting heavily with a friend and being beaten on by super-villains, are stupid. First, it is reminiscent of those awful bands that can't play very well, so they play loud to cover it up. The writer is unsure of his (ordinarily I'd say "her or his", but this is comic book writers we're talking about) ability to interest the reader with the emotional content of the scene, so all sorts of semi-related flash is thrown in "to keep things interesting". This insults the audience even more than most television screenplays. Second, this is one of the most frequent of comic-book stylistic flaws; if someone had just done it once, I probably wouldn't have called it "stupid", but the ten thousandth reptition of the mistake is just too much to bear. It has nothing to do with seeming strange and silly; it is a matter of style. There's nothing wrong with strangeness and silliness, but they are too often used as excuses for stylistic mediocrity. -=- Tim Maroney, Carnegie-Mellon University, Networking ARPA: Tim.Maroney@CMU-CS-K uucp: seismo!cmu-cs-k!tim CompuServe: 74176,1360 audio: shout "Hey, Tim!" Brought to you by Super Global Mega Corp .com