Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site gcc-bill.ARPA
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!think!harvard!gcc-bill!john
From: john@gcc-bill.ARPA (John Allred)
Newsgroups: net.consumers,net.auto
Subject: Re: But at what cost...
Message-ID: <334@gcc-bill.ARPA>
Date: Mon, 30-Sep-85 09:04:21 EDT
Article-I.D.: gcc-bill.334
Posted: Mon Sep 30 09:04:21 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 2-Oct-85 01:18:52 EDT
References: <388@decwrl.UUCP> <354@mecc.UUCP> <1770@hao.UUCP> <1774@hao.UUCP>
Reply-To: john@gcc-bill.UUCP (John Allred)
Organization: General Computer Company, Cambridge Ma (Home of the HyperDrive)
Lines: 17
Xref: watmath net.consumers:3069 net.auto:8355
Summary: 

In article <1774@hao.UUCP> woods@hao.UUCP (Greg Woods) writes:

>> This, I believe, is the answer...I can't think of anything better to satisfy
>> (almost) everyone than to have a choice of passive belts and airbags.  Sure,
>> the non-belters will grumble and whine at the cost of the airbag...perhaps
>> it will be enough incentive for them to start belting.

As has been mentioned before, passive belts are *dangerous*.  You get into an
accident, the doors spring open, and then you get thrown out of the car.  If
that happens, you are also probably dead.

Sorry, but the above quote should not be attibuted to Greg Woods, but to 
whomever he was responding to.
-- 
John Allred
General Computer Company 
uucp: seismo!harvard!gcc-bill!john


Brought to you by Super Global Mega Corp .com