Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 (Tek) 9/28/84 based on 9/17/84; site tekecs.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!orca!tekecs!jeffw
From: jeffw@tekecs.UUCP (Jeff Winslow)
Newsgroups: net.women,net.motss,net.flame
Subject: Re: Possible Ban on Pornography
Message-ID: <5690@tekecs.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 17-Sep-85 03:51:34 EDT
Article-I.D.: tekecs.5690
Posted: Tue Sep 17 03:51:34 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 19-Sep-85 04:50:44 EDT
References: <369@scirtp.UUCP> <1625@ihuxl.UUCP> <11317@rochester.UUCP> <691@rduxb.UUCP> <24@unc.unc.UUCP> <1159@ihuxn.UUCP>
Organization: Tektronix, Wilsonville OR
Lines: 12
Xref: watmath net.women:7448 net.motss:2071 net.flame:11958

>                    What you call a "feminist" attempt to modify
> the definition of the word is simply one method to try to make
> pornographers responsible for their actions.

No, it is a method to try to make pornographers responsible for the actions
of people who consume their products. Thus tending to absolve those people
of their true responsibility for their own actions. 

Just one of the many problems with pornography bans.

					Jeff Winslow
				"Why do you hate the Socratic method?"


Brought to you by Super Global Mega Corp .com