Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site pyuxd.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!pyuxww!pyuxd!rlr
From: rlr@pyuxd.UUCP (Rich Rosen)
Newsgroups: net.flame
Subject: Re: Possible Ban on Pornography
Message-ID: <1757@pyuxd.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 22-Sep-85 17:30:43 EDT
Article-I.D.: pyuxd.1757
Posted: Sun Sep 22 17:30:43 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 23-Sep-85 02:42:03 EDT
References: <369@scirtp.UUCP> <-1988585@sysvis> <11617@rochester.UUCP>
Organization: Whatever we're calling ourselves this week
Lines: 32

> What makes YOOOUUUU the spokes person for what people want and don't want.
> Who asked you to determine what is good or bad for us.  You are a manipulated
> fool, and the sorry thing about it is you don't know it.  Hugh Hefner and
> his types love people like you.  What you read and watch in the media is
> already being manipulated by a handful of people.  They ARE determining what
> is good for us.  [RAY FRANK]

Ray, you are really are a brilliant satirist.  I mean, no human being could
possibly make the position of the flailing ignorant know-nothing conservative
look worse than you have in net.abortion, net.religion, etc.  I especially
liked the bit about your being worried about forces "infiltrating and breaking
down taboos" (in an earlier article).  I mean, that's utterly awe inspiring
farce!  Taboos, irrational fears and restrictions held by society for no
discernible reason, SHOULD be broken down.  What better way to make yourself
look foolish than to appear "worried" that this is going to happen!  I admire
your willingness to make yourself look so foolish for the sake of making
your satirical point.  And that first sentence above?  A stroke of genius!
Displaying the opinion of an obviously duped foolish person claiming that it
is someone else who is duped and foolish!  And THEN saying "what makes YOU
the spokesperson" while at the same time claiming to be the spokesperson
yourself!  What gave you away was your use of the word "spokesperson".
No self-respecting (if there is such a thing) know-nothingist would
deliberately use a non-sexist term where a simple sexist one (spokesman) would
suffice.

(Or is Ray Frank an alias you use when you wish to don this guise for
satirical purposes?)

In any case, my congratulations.
-- 
"iY AHORA, INFORMACION INTERESANTE ACERCA DE... LA LLAMA!"
	Rich Rosen    ihnp4!pyuxd!rlr


Brought to you by Super Global Mega Corp .com