Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site srcsip.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!stolaf!umn-cs!srcsip!notch From: notch@srcsip.UUCP (Michael k Notch) Newsgroups: net.flame Subject: Re: Attn: Hooters/Hootees Message-ID: <1487@srcsip.UUCP> Date: Mon, 30-Sep-85 10:26:00 EDT Article-I.D.: srcsip.1487 Posted: Mon Sep 30 10:26:00 1985 Date-Received: Wed, 2-Oct-85 06:19:46 EDT References: <-1988573@sysvis> Reply-To: notch@srcsip.UUCP (Michael k Notch) Organization: Honeywell SRC (SIP), Mpls MN Lines: 45 In article <-1988573@sysvis> george@sysvis writes: > >I am writing this note especially to the [hooter,hootees],[asserters,attackers] >on this network who have reduced the open discussion/forum groups to the level >of "net.lets.see.who.can.jump.in.on.it.first" (Maybe, at least, there's a peri- >od out of place somewhere!) and the "Right-on" brotherhood who supports them. >In the first case, there's fear of the unknown, in the second is safety in num- >bers. . . . >The worst of these offenders are the ones who have appointed themselves as >"Guardians of the Faith" (or "Dogma Denizens") who range and patrol the >entire network in order to have some sort of personal vendetta with any >perceived "slob-who-doesn't-believe-as-I-do." The public inquisitions held >by these "guardians" are possibly some of the best examples I have ever seen >of those with lowered self-esteem. > >There is a local college professor who teaches Mental Health courses, among >other things. I use the professor's library frequently when trying to >understand what it is that people are really saying. It would do some of >you a lot of good also to read something besides engineering data, and then >enlighten your brethren on the net as to what you have learned. This is in >opposition to trying to show them how intelligent you are by vitriolic attack >on their beingness. By these attacks, you are really showing all of us how >poorly you feel about yourselves. Making "light of" or making fun of other >people is one of the first signs of someone in danger of totally losing their >own humanity and self-image. Condemning others is particularly egregious. > >In sum, if you can't agree with someone else, fine. That is your prerogative. >No matter how narcissistic you have become, this world is not required to >think like yourself. Please post some of your enlightenment in a positive, >referenced, manner so that others may also come to your enlightened conclusions >as they see your data. If you do agree, it is not necessary to post "Right-on" >messages to show that you have the same degree of understanding as does the >originator. If you choose to violently disagree, fine, spend your anger in >the library in order to find out the truth of the matter. When you can fin- >ally contribute POSITIVELY, do so. Start a separate discussion on an alternate >topic. Just please stop the denigration of yourselves by attacking others. PRAISE THE LORD ALIMIGHTY!!!! AMEN. -Mk Notch. Brought to you by Super Global Mega Corp .com