Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 (Tek) 9/28/84 based on 9/17/84; site hammer.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!orca!hammer!seifert From: seifert@hammer.UUCP (Snoopy) Newsgroups: net.dcom,net.video,net.ham-radio Subject: Re: Satellite viewing "freedoms" Message-ID: <1517@hammer.UUCP> Date: Tue, 24-Sep-85 12:27:34 EDT Article-I.D.: hammer.1517 Posted: Tue Sep 24 12:27:34 1985 Date-Received: Fri, 27-Sep-85 03:00:08 EDT References: <763@vortex.UUCP> <253@ccivax.UUCP> Reply-To: seifert@hammer.UUCP (Snoopy) Organization: The Daisy Hill Puppy Farm Lines: 16 Xref: watmath net.dcom:1319 net.video:1544 net.ham-radio:3283 In article <253@ccivax.UUCP> rb@ccivax.UUCP (rex ballard) writes: > Suppose the frequencies being used effected human health (X-Rays). > Do you suppose we would allow the Commercial station to DEMAND payment > for the priveledge of recieving these cancer causing rays? > ... > When I got my first General Class liscence, the frequencies now > used for satellite and microwave transmissions were ham bands, > now they want to charge for the use of the reciever! Microwaves *do* effect human health. Can you say "cataract"? (along with many other things) Snoopy tektronix!hammer!seifert tektronix!tekecs!doghouse.TEK!snoopy Brought to you by Super Global Mega Corp .com