Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 (Tek) 9/26/83; site teklabs.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!tekcrl!teklabs!rafaeld
From: rafaeld@teklabs.UUCP (Rafael De Arce)
Newsgroups: net.ham-radio
Subject: re: Call for restraint
Message-ID: <3210@teklabs.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 25-Sep-85 18:17:43 EDT
Article-I.D.: teklabs.3210
Posted: Wed Sep 25 18:17:43 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 28-Sep-85 07:17:08 EDT
Organization: Tektronix, Beaverton OR
Lines: 15


Yes! I agree. We all worked for our licenses to communicate with each other not
passively easedrop. 

Ask your self if you would like someone else listening in on your conversations
regardless wether the easedropper knew you or not.

Let's drop this issue and move on to other things.

Case in point... F.C.C. agrees that local government may not zone antennas out.
I've been waiting for a decision on this for a while. That ruling is cause to
celebrate. Of course, it's got to go thru the Supreme Court before it's offi-
cial!

Can someone tell me where I can read an article on this subject?


Brought to you by Super Global Mega Corp .com