Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/3/84; site enmasse.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!think!harvard!talcott!panda!enmasse!mroddy
From: mroddy@enmasse.UUCP (Mark Roddy)
Newsgroups: net.legal,net.religion
Subject: Re: Re: Swearing in Court - Separation of Church/State
Message-ID: <474@enmasse.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 2-Oct-85 10:05:18 EDT
Article-I.D.: enmasse.474
Posted: Wed Oct  2 10:05:18 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 3-Oct-85 06:59:56 EDT
References: <1695@akgua.UUCP> <707@tpvax.fluke.UUCP>
Organization: Enmasse Computer Corp., Acton, Mass.
Lines: 17
Xref: watmath net.legal:2414 net.religion:7859

[]
> If it is because fuzzy thinking results in the equation
> 
>     god = church
> 
> then maybe you ought to look up some definitions in your Funk & Wagnall's.

well actually "in god" implies a monotheistic view of reality, and those of us
who either are atheistic, or pantheistic, feel that the institutionalisation
of a monotheistic (and actually it is a specifically christian) viewpoint
by the state violates the intention of the first amendment.
-- 
						Mark Roddy
						Net working,
						Just reading the news.

					(harvard!talcott!panda!enmasse!mroddy)


Brought to you by Super Global Mega Corp .com