Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.7.0.8 $; site trsvax Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!convex!trsvax!mikey From: mikey@trsvax Newsgroups: net.micro Subject: Re: NEC V20 8088 compatible microproces Message-ID: <53400074@trsvax> Date: Mon, 16-Sep-85 11:31:00 EDT Article-I.D.: trsvax.53400074 Posted: Mon Sep 16 11:31:00 1985 Date-Received: Thu, 19-Sep-85 05:03:46 EDT References: <207@ittral.UUCP> Lines: 42 Nf-ID: #R:ittral.UUCP:-20700:trsvax:53400074:000:2012 Nf-From: trsvax!mikey Sep 16 10:31:00 1985 I went back and dug up the article about Intel and NEC fighting it out over the V20. First, it is in the June 17 issue of EE imes, page 7 if anybody wnats to look it up. The following is some of the information from the article. Second, NEC filed the first lawsuit, asking a federal court to rule there is no infringement, this was after providing Intel with samples the previous August but getting no response. Third, the Intel 8088 uses a single bus structure, the V20 uses a double bus structure. Fourth, the Intel 8088 uses microwords 21 bits wide, the V20 uses microwords 29 bits wide (sorry about the number error in a previous posting) Finally, Intel and NEC have an agreement giving each other full access to each others patents, so there can be no patent infringment suit to begin with. Intel can't sue for the microcode, even if it was a direct copy. As it is, they are suing for using the same "expression of program". If they win, this could apply to all aspects of "reverse engineering" causing all kinds of restrictive ramifications in the software and hardware market. There is other info in the article, read it if you are really interested. As to the V20 vs the 8088, speed in some aspects is incredible with the V20, but on a system that is disk intensive, one access and you lose a lot of the benefits, unless you redo the disk I/O to take advantage of the faster I/O, probably just experiment with interleave would be enough. Overall, don't expect lightning, just 5% to 30% in most cases. There is an 8 mhz part, but I don't have anything to try it in. There is also a numeric coprocesor. I don't know anything about it's speed, but I would like it just because it's CMOS and won't turn massive amounts of power into massive amopunts of heat. Be careful of the gotchas, bugs in programs that may become worse due to different execution of previously illegal opcodes. Presonally, I got a sample of the V20 for my brothers Tandy 1000 and it runs great. mikey at trsvax Brought to you by Super Global Mega Corp .com