Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 alpha 4/3/85; site ukma.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ukma!sambo
From: sambo@ukma.UUCP (Father of micro-ln)
Newsgroups: net.micro.pc,net.micro
Subject: Re: Any C compilers that produce assembly language?
Message-ID: <2231@ukma.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 23-Sep-85 00:02:09 EDT
Article-I.D.: ukma.2231
Posted: Mon Sep 23 00:02:09 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 24-Sep-85 03:12:09 EDT
References: <2223@ukma.UUCP>
Reply-To: sambo@ukma.UUCP (Father of micro-ln)
Organization: Univ. of KY Mathematical Sciences
Lines: 17
Xref: watmath net.micro.pc:5367 net.micro:12071
Summary: Microsoft C is not one of them.

In article <2223@ukma.UUCP> I (Father of micro-ln) write:
>Does anyone know which MS-DOS C compilers are capable of outputting Micro-
>soft assembly language?

Someone told me something I think everyone should know (though I suspect
everyone already knows this anyway).  Microsoft C has the switch /Fa, or
something like that, that is supposed to make it output assembly language.
It takes quite a bit of doing to make the output acceptable to Microsoft's
MASM assembler.  There is no word on whether Microsoft plans to fix this.
--
Samuel A. Figueroa, Dept. of CS, Univ. of KY, Lexington, KY  40506-0027
ARPA: ukma!sambo<@ANL-MCS>, or sambo%ukma.uucp@anl-mcs.arpa,
      or even anlams!ukma!sambo@ucbvax.arpa
UUCP: {ucbvax,unmvax,boulder,oddjob}!anlams!ukma!sambo,
      or cbosgd!ukma!sambo

	"Micro-ln is great, if only people would start using it."


Brought to you by Super Global Mega Corp .com