Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2.fluke 9/24/84; site vax1.fluke.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!qantel!hplabs!tektronix!uw-beaver!fluke!pwv
From: pwv@fluke.UUCP (Pat Vilbrandt)
Newsgroups: net.micro.pc,net.micro
Subject: Re: Any C compilers that produce assembly language?
Message-ID: <1181@vax1.fluke.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 24-Sep-85 11:38:22 EDT
Article-I.D.: vax1.1181
Posted: Tue Sep 24 11:38:22 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 28-Sep-85 07:11:07 EDT
References: <2223@ukma.UUCP> <2231@ukma.UUCP>
Distribution: net
Organization: John Fluke Mfg. Co., Inc., Everett, WA
Lines: 27
Keywords: Microsoft
Xref: watmath net.micro.pc:5415 net.micro:12115


> In article <2223@ukma.UUCP> I (Father of micro-ln) write:
> >Does anyone know which MS-DOS C compilers are capable of outputting Micro-
> >soft assembly language?

> ...  Microsoft C has the switch /Fa, or
> something like that, that is supposed to make it output assembly language.
> It takes quite a bit of doing to make the output acceptable to Microsoft's
> MASM assembler.  ...
> --
> Samuel A. Figueroa, Dept. of CS, Univ. of KY, Lexington, KY  40506-0027

I beg to differ.  I am currently using version 3.00 of the Microsoft
C Compiler and the /Fa switch does indeed produce assembly code that is
compatible with MASM version 3.00.  I do recommend this version of the
C compiler.  I have found no irregularities with it, although I hear 
previous versions had their share.

-- 

   Pat Vilbrandt
   John Fluke Mfg. Co., Inc.
   Everett, Washington USA
UUCP:
   { decvax!uw-beaver, ucbvax!lbl-csam, allegra, ssc-vax, decwrl!sun }!fluke!pwv
ARPA:
	fluke!pwv@uw-beaver.ARPA


Brought to you by Super Global Mega Corp .com