Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2.fluke 9/24/84; site vax1.fluke.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!fluke!pwv
From: pwv@fluke.UUCP (Pat Vilbrandt)
Newsgroups: net.micro
Subject: Re: Any C compilers that produce assembly language?
Message-ID: <1185@vax1.fluke.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 26-Sep-85 10:52:22 EDT
Article-I.D.: vax1.1185
Posted: Thu Sep 26 10:52:22 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 29-Sep-85 06:38:30 EDT
References: <1645@brl-tgr.ARPA>
Distribution: net
Organization: John Fluke Mfg. Co., Inc., Everett, WA
Lines: 23
Keywords: Microsoft C, version 3.00

"Does anyone know which MS-DOS C compilers are capable of outputting Micro-
 soft assembly language?"

From: DRF@SU-SCORE.ARPA (David Fuchs)
    "Don't be fooled into thinking that Microsoft C will do it! ..." 

Please, PLEASE, could you provide the version number of the compiler in your
flame!!  I have found no problems with version 3.00 of MSC using the /Fa
option with version 3.00 of MASM.  Be aware that previous versions of MSC
are totally different (based on the Lattice C compiler, I believe).  

Yes, I had to get the most recent version of the assembler, but not because of 
incompatiblity with the compiler.  It (IBM version 1.00) was producing BAD CODE.

-- 

   Pat Vilbrandt
   John Fluke Mfg. Co., Inc.
   Everett, Washington USA
UUCP:
   { decvax!uw-beaver, ucbvax!lbl-csam, allegra, ssc-vax, decwrl!sun }!fluke!pwv
ARPA:
	fluke!pwv@uw-beaver.ARPA


Brought to you by Super Global Mega Corp .com