Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 Unisoft-Cosmos; site kepler.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!zeta!sabre!petrus!bellcore!decvax!decwrl!Glacier!well!micropro!kepler!mojo
From: mojo@kepler.UUCP (Morris Jones)
Newsgroups: net.micro
Subject: Re: The Final Word version 2
Message-ID: <278@kepler.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 3-Oct-85 15:52:33 EDT
Article-I.D.: kepler.278
Posted: Thu Oct  3 15:52:33 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 5-Oct-85 07:12:36 EDT
References: <1789@brl-tgr.UUCP> <97800007@ima.UUCP>
Reply-To: mojo@kepler.UUCP (Morris Jones)
Organization: MicroPro Int'l Corp., San Rafael, CA
Lines: 18

In article <97800007@ima.UUCP> johnl@ima.UUCP writes:
>We have been a beta-test site for Final Word 2 for about six months.

Does Final Word really give permission to their beta-test sites to
discuss an unreleased product?  If they did, was that a good idea?

If I were considering purchasing Final Word I think I would postpone
it for a while to see the new release.  For that reason alone our
beta testers sign non-disclosure agreements.

My question to the net is this:  Since Final Word obviously did give
permission to their beta testers to discuss the product, do you think
it was a good business decision?

-- 
Mojo
... Morris Jones, MicroPro Product Development
{ptsfa,hplabs,glacier,lll-crg}!well!micropro!kepler!mojo


Brought to you by Super Global Mega Corp .com