Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.7.0.8 $; site uiucdcs
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!mcewan
From: mcewan@uiucdcs.CS.UIUC.EDU
Newsgroups: net.motss
Subject: Re: banning pornography
Message-ID: <40400021@uiucdcs>
Date: Mon, 30-Sep-85 13:19:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: uiucdcs.40400021
Posted: Mon Sep 30 13:19:00 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 2-Oct-85 08:10:22 EDT
References: <885@ptsfa.UUCP>
Lines: 19
Nf-ID: #R:ptsfa.UUCP:-88500:uiucdcs:40400021:000:743
Nf-From: uiucdcs.CS.UIUC.EDU!mcewan    Sep 30 12:19:00 1985


>   The idea of free speech
> is silly to me.  Would you think it was reasonable for someone to start
> telling hundreds of people that YOU personally should be killed?  Deny
> them the right to do this and you deny them free speech.  But allow them
> to do this and there is a legal way to murder.  Which do you choose?  To
> me the choice is obvious.  Any reasonable society has to put limits on
> so-called "free speech".

Would you kill someone because I told you to? If you did, do you think I should
be charged with the killing?

			Scott McEwan
			{ihnp4,pur-ee}!uiucdcs!mcewan

"I know what you are. Nut. Screwball. Flake. Lunatic. Fruitcake.
 Bats in the attic. Psycho. All your dogs aren't barking."

"Are too! Are too! Woof! Woof!"


Brought to you by Super Global Mega Corp .com