Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 alpha 4/15/85; site leadsv.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!bbnccv!bbncca!linus!philabs!prls!amdimage!amdcad!cae780!leadsv!sas From: sas@leadsv.UUCP (Scott Stewart) Newsgroups: net.movies Subject: Re: More on Totally Bad Movies Message-ID: <634@leadsv.UUCP> Date: Wed, 2-Oct-85 15:58:01 EDT Article-I.D.: leadsv.634 Posted: Wed Oct 2 15:58:01 1985 Date-Received: Sun, 6-Oct-85 06:26:48 EDT References: <327@cylixd.UUCP> <280@tekcrl.UUCP> Organization: LMSC-LEADS, Sunnyvale, Ca. Lines: 18 Summary: rebuttal (sp?) In article <280@tekcrl.UUCP>, terryl@tekcrl.UUCP writes: > > My vote for a totally bad movie would have to go to "Sargeant Pepper's >Lonely Hearts Club Band", the movie, that is. Acting was non-existant(how they >got George Burns to do this movie I could never figure out); the plot consisted >of taking a lot of Beatle songs and then trying to write a story around the >songs was just totally ludicrous. All in all, a VERY bad film (to quote old >Leonard Pinth, himself!!!) Yes, but the original music and lyrics were good, and even the BeeGees couldn't destroy it. Therefore, it can't be totally bad. Scott A. Stewart LMSC - Sunnyvale P.S. Personally, I liked some of the songs, though not as good as the original Beatle's versions. Brought to you by Super Global Mega Corp .com