Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84 (Fortune 01.1b1); site graffiti.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!think!harvard!seismo!ut-sally!ut-ngp!shell!graffiti!peter
From: peter@graffiti.UUCP (Peter da Silva)
Newsgroups: net.news.group,net.news
Subject: Re: A proposal for a modified voting rule
Message-ID: <246@graffiti.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 25-Sep-85 10:50:33 EDT
Article-I.D.: graffiti.246
Posted: Wed Sep 25 10:50:33 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 28-Sep-85 08:13:55 EDT
References: <3215@nsc.UUCP> <1471@cbosgd.UUCP> <635@ucsfcgl.UUCP>
Organization: The Power Elite, Houston, TX
Lines: 7
Xref: watmath net.news.group:3846 net.news:3979

> Before everyone starts buying into this per-site vote bit, we better
> decide what we mean by a vote.  If we can't agree on that, it is rather
> pointless to decide that it would be nice to use a per-site vote, since
> we'll never get one.
> 		Ken Arnold

How about just letting each site handle the voting as it sees fit?


Brought to you by Super Global Mega Corp .com